7 Nov 2007
MITCHELL V HAMPSTEAD ALSO KNOWN AS HAMPSTEAD-BELL AND HAMPSTEAD-SMITH HC AK CIV 2007 - 404- 1487
- Citation
- openlaw-f83f29de_d44f_4b84_b3b8_5682ba726aab.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Because no respondent opposed the discovery orders and the applicants had effected service and provided undertakings on costs to ANZ, the Court granted the discovery orders sought in paras 3,4 and 5 of the interlocutory application without deciding the contested legal question about the scope of Rule 621.