8 Dec 2023
GIGGLE HQ LTD v GIGGLE DEVELOPMENTS LTD [2023] NZHC 3564
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 3564
- Court
- High Court
Order (c) was ambiguous because the term "dealings" could reasonably be read to refer only to past interactions or to include future interactions; because the order was not clear and unambiguous the statutory threshold in s16(3)(b)(i) was not satisfied and the contempt application must fail.