28 Oct 2008
DEO DATT SHARMA V NIRMALI WATI HC AK CIV2008-404-3124
- Citation
- openlaw-62bd2604_4c08_495c_978c_1b3c42fcffa8.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The adjudication order was refused because the sealed certificate of judgment was unsafe to rely upon: the sealed costs order appears to include reserved costs that were never determined and the correct remedy is recall of judgment rather than reliance on the existing sealed order, so the court exercised its discretion not to make an adjudication order despite the unpaid debt.