30 Oct 2017
S v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2017] NZHC 2629
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 2629
- Court
- High Court
No breach of NZBORA ss 9 or 23(5) was established on the evidence; statutory safeguards, regular clinical reviews and external oversight were adequate; contested incidents either lacked evidential foundation or were lawful, proportionate responses to real and immediate risk and clinical judgment on rehabilitation and treatment was not to be second‑guessed by the Court. Claims dismissed.