30 Sept 2016
LEPIONKA & COMPANY INVESTMENTS LTD v HORSESHOE BEND HAWKES BAY LTD _x000b_[2016] NZHC 2318
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 2318
- Court
- High Court
Horseshoe failed to demonstrate an arguable proprietary interest in Lot 7 under the sale agreements: the contracts either vested ownership of Lot 7 in a lot owner or contemplated a company to be incorporated by the vendor (not Horseshoe), and Horseshoe was not the vendor nor incorporated the company; Lepionka as mortgagee in possession validly adopted vendor rights under s 179 PLA and may transfer free of the caveat under s 105 LTA; consequently the caveat could not be maintained and was ordered removed.