21 Feb 2014
CHAO & ANOR v LI & ANOR [2014] NZHC 248
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 248
- Court
- High Court
The originating application was dismissed because the caveat was inappropriately worded and could not properly be maintained against Ms Chen, there was no basis to maintain the caveat as framed; however the applicants were permitted to commence a s148 application to address any legitimate claim against Mr Li, and respondents were entitled to costs on a 2B basis for the interlocutory dismissal.