24 Aug 2012
ASSURED (CH) LIMITED V BEVAN PIERCE HC CHCH CIV-2010-409-000201
- Citation
- openlaw-e652a067_8a98_4bda_b5df_f94411116df1.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave under s165 was granted because the proceeding was not frivolous or fanciful, the applicant undertook to meet costs, it was in the company's interests to pursue the claim and evidence indicated the defendant was using his control of the company to prevent prosecution; further and better discovery was ordered because the defendant's asset disclosure appeared incomplete and he was directed to disclose or swear he has no such assets.