18 Nov 2010
EARL RAYMOND HAGAMAN V BARBARA JEAN FAIRBANK CA682/2010
- Citation
- openlaw-b7dc278a_7e40_4b08_be00_ae6cc8d9b0f3.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court held the High Court orders did not breach s185(3) because the depositions were intended to elicit evidence for use at trial (not a mere investigatory exercise), issues of privilege and trustee compellability can be addressed during the deposition process or by the High Court, and discretionary factors (delay, oppression) did not require refusal; therefore the appeal was dismissed.