29 Mar 2022
LITTLE v LITTLE [2022] NZHC 601
- Citation
- [2022] NZFLR 316
- Court
- High Court
Leave to admit new evidence was refused as not sufficiently fresh, cogent or necessary; the trial judge's factual findings and discretionary assessments were not displaced on rehearing except that the s15 award was modest and increased by NZD 12,000 to achieve a just outcome; the s18B occupational rent award was affirmed as a proper exercise of discretion and occupational rent is an accepted alternative to interest on capital; broad discovery orders on appeal were refused.