15 Oct 2021
COMMISSIONER OF NEW ZEALAND POLICE v RAE [2021] NZHC 2766
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 2766
- Court
- High Court
S 28 application dismissed: respondent was not entitled to release because he had available unrestrained assets under his effective control (notably Woodlands Grove and recoverable loan), failed to provide credible documentary and third‑party affidavit evidence for claimed debts and overseas accounts, many invoices were not obligations of him personally, and there was credible evidence he intended to use any released funds for impermissible purposes (replacing tainted offshore structures); adverse inferences drawn for non‑disclosure.