25 Jun 2014
VINCENT ROSS SIEMER v MICHAEL PETER STIASSNY & ANOR [2014] NZSC 80
- Citation
- [2014] NZSC 80
- Court
- Supreme Court
The participation of Glazebrook and Arnold JJ in the s 28(3) review was required and permissible under s 28(3) as interpreted in Howard v ACC despite their earlier involvement; no basis for recall was shown, so the recall application was dismissed.