17 May 2005
Logan v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2005] NZACC 159
- Court
- District Court
Court preferred the applicant's specific factual and expert evidence (Ms Reilly workplace assessment and Dr Glass) over the respondent's generalized medical opinion, found the claimant's keyboard/mouse technique caused CTS, found no material non-employment causative activities, and determined that the risk of CTS is significantly greater for persons performing those specific work characteristics; consequently s30 satisfied, ACC decision quashed and cover granted.