13 Dec 2010
JELLYMAN V FITZGIBBONS FLOOR COVERINGS LIMITED HC CHCH CIV-2010-409-000099
- Citation
- openlaw-f90d9d13_068b_41b6_858a_50b225594669.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Section 13 requirements were met and the debtor failed to prove it would be just and equitable or otherwise appropriate to refuse adjudication because the repayment proposal was unrealistic, unsupported by company finances, the debtor's conduct was blameworthy, and the interests of finality and creditors outweighed the debtor's submissions; accordingly the Court adjudicated the debtor bankrupt and ordered costs.