12 Dec 1996
Satherley v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1996] NZACC 150
- Court
- District Court
Appellant failed to discharge the onus of proving that repayment would be inequitable: the court accepted the Corporation was entitled to recover the overpayments under s77 because the appellant did not establish detriment or a degree of alteration of position sufficient to make repayment inequitable and feasible alternatives (sale of vehicle, instalment arrangements) existed; appeal dismissed.