21 Sept 2009
RONGONUI V R SC 66/2009
- Citation
- RONGONUI V R SC 66/2009
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was granted to determine whether the Court of Appeal correctly applied sections 35, 90(5) and 94 of the Evidence Act 2006.
New Zealand Case Law
Section 94
21 Feb 2008
RENNIE & ORS V THE THAMES COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL AND ANOR HC HAM CIV 2005-419-943
- Citation
- openlaw-f911d4d5_8c59_4dca_bda6_7b6802504bfc.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Council lacked adequate and reliable information and applied an incorrect perspective when dispensing with notification of the earthworks application; that procedural and informational failure invalidated the September/December 2004 non‑notification decision and the related 2004 and 2005 resource consents, requiring the consents to be set aside and the Council to reconsider on a notified basis (at least notifying neighbouring owners); the building consent is not set aside but its efficacy is compromised by the invalid resource consents.