8 Dec 2003
PPCS LIMITED V RICHMOND LIMITED CA CA253/02
- Citation
- openlaw-05fc92c8_d7d2_45b6_aeb1_ac1ab0beb0c9.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Conditional leave refused because the proposed appeal did not raise claims to the applicants' property or civil rights under r2(a) and was not of great public or general importance under r2(b); the issue was fact specific, unlikely to recur, and better determined locally, and finality and delay weighed against granting leave.