14 Nov 2007
FORSYTH V EKDAHL AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2007-404-4622
- Citation
- openlaw-390b0c91_d666_4301_ad61_02ecd95d444c.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Because there was no reliable evidence of the twelve‑month turnover for the period prior to the October 2004 agreement, the court could not conclude clause 5 had been triggered and therefore the caveat could not be ordered to lapse; the caveat is preserved conditionally while the applicant must commence substantive proceedings within 14 days to determine entitlement.