14 Oct 2004
TEEPA V R SC SC CRI 9/2004
- Citation
- openlaw-cde7fdab_e9ed_4a3e_891a_2606edea0958.pdf
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant advanced abstract grounds that did not raise a matter of general or public importance; the sentencing judge gave reasons and the Court of Appeal had fully reviewed the minimum term, and the case concerned the fixing of a particular sentence rather than a point of sentencing principle, so the interests of justice did not require further appeal.