18 Jun 2010
MADELEY LIMITED V VACUUM NZ LIMITED AND ORS HC AK CIV 2010-404-1028
- Citation
- openlaw-fb702b13_bb62_47a0_ba53_31d9debf8bab.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application for a separate question was dismissed because a determination of the repayment date would not dispose of or materially advance the substantive dispute given the defendants' counter-claim alleging misrepresentation; therefore there was no advantage in directing a separate question and the proceeding should be timetabled with directions and costs awarded to the plaintiff.