26 Nov 2009
SAMUELS V ATKINSON AND ORS CA CA367/2008
- Citation
- openlaw-e9656366_4738_4155_b12b_3ee75e78c3b1.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court allowed the appeal, holding that the High Court's vesting of Glenholme shares was an erroneous quantification; the Judge failed to net off benefits received and to apply s3 factors adequately, and the proper remedy was monetary awards from the estate of $100,000 to Jennifer Dainty and $50,000 each to Donald and Alexander Atkinson, with costs to be paid by the estate.