17 Nov 2022
YOUNG v ZHANG [2022] NZCA 560
- Citation
- [2022] NZCA 560
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court refused to admit the proposed further evidence because it was not shown to be fresh, relevant or cogent under r12B; the evidence and submissions did not establish a miscarriage of justice; the consent order was binding when made; and the facts and chronology supported the conclusion that Ms Ying procured the sale in breach of the consent order with the necessary mens rea for criminal contempt, so recall was declined.