17 May 2010
IYENGAR V KRISHNAMURTHI HC AK CIV 2007-404-1132
- Citation
- openlaw-59744576_5087_47e9_9314_4cfcf83bb07b.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court refused to set aside the judgment because clause 9 of the settlement agreement plainly authorised the plaintiff to enter judgment on defendants' non-payment; there was no evidence the plaintiff acted fraudulently, unconscionably or in wilful or reckless disregard of defendants' rights. The form of the sealed document did not invalidate the judgment. Alleged breaches by the plaintiff (RipoffReport and Indian prosecutions) are prima facie matters for separate breach proceedings and do not justify setting aside the judgment; the stay application was adjourned for further evidence regar…