9 Feb 2016
BROADHURST v BROADHURST [2016] NZHC 85
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 85
- Court
- High Court
Application for a separate preliminary hearing under r10.15 was refused because the risk of demarcation problems and the need for the entire factual chronology and evidence to be before the Court outweighed any potential advantages; the court required full case management and directed specific timetabling and discovery steps to prepare the matter for a single allocated trial.