New Zealand Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Share registration

Legal area

Court

10 Apr 2017

NEEDHAM v SAMY TRUSTEE LIMITED [2017] NZCA 117

Citation

(2017) 24 PRNZ 184
Court

Court of Appeal

The appeal is dismissed because the ground that STL had to discharge its mortgage before receiving shares was not properly pleaded and the evidence was incomplete and unsatisfactory on that factual issue; the MOA could not be construed in isolation given subsequent conduct and the Addendum, and it would be unfair to decide the new contention on the deficient record.
5 Aug 2016

SHARROCK v WEDD [2016] NZHC 1802

Citation

[2016] NZHC 1802
Court

High Court

The recall application is dismissed because no new statute, regulation or higher authority was identified, no failure to cite relevant authority occurred, and no special circumstances were shown; the applicant merely seeks to relitigate matters already decided and the evidence before the Court supported the original findings that Mr Sharrock satisfied the payment obligation for the Just Steel shares and became a director and shareholder.