17 Nov 2016
ZHAO v THE LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER [2016] NZHC 2758
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 2758
- Court
- High Court
The application to recall the earlier judgment was dismissed because any omission to separately address paragraph [11](1)(k) did not produce a different outcome—the LCRO had addressed the factual matters and there was no error of law in upholding the Standards Committee's finding—and there was no basis to recall the judgment on costs since costs follow the event and awarding costs without a separate preliminary hearing is consistent with established practice.