8 Oct 2013
EVGENY ORLOV v NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY [2013] NZSC 94
- Citation
- [2013] NZSC 94
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was refused because it was not necessary in the interests of justice to hear an interlocutory challenge to the Court of Appeal's decision: there is no implied seriousness threshold in s 152(2)(a), the issue is more properly addressed after the Tribunal process and on appeal, and the Court of Appeal's conclusions on the law were dispositive.