28 Feb 2008
MIHOS V ATTORNEY-GENERAL HC WN CIV-2004-485-1399
- Citation
- openlaw-b574956b_cae9_41ff_a63a_e61bcba30ac2.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Structured proportionality does not apply to this forfeiture of property case; a variable intensity (light‑handed) review is appropriate given Parliament's confiscation scheme and the penal/deterrent purpose; on that standard the Minister's refusal to waive forfeiture was not irrational or disproportionate and the application was dismissed.