20 May 2014
Potez v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2014] NZACC 116
- Court
- District Court
By March 2012 ACC had reasonably provided all vocational rehabilitation it was required and justified to provide under the claimant's IRP, the evidence did not show that provision or trial of electric pruners at that time would have been likely to produce sustained 30+ hours per week in the vineyard, and therefore ACC was justified in commencing the vocational independence process under s110(3); the review decisions upholding ACC's determinations are correct and appeal is dismissed.