11 Apr 2006
INTEC USA, LLC HC AK CIV-2006-404-001018
- Citation
- openlaw-70b2dae3_3600_42a0_a9a5_bcadff715f12.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application to recall the 23 March judgment was dismissed because the issues Intec sought to determine (whether the arbitral tribunal is an "overseas Court of competent jurisdiction" or whether the Court has inherent jurisdiction to issue subpoenas for a foreign arbitration) were irrelevant to the grounds of the original dismissal, Intec had available remedies (appeal or a compliant new letter of request under s48A), and Intec did not meet the narrow threshold required to recall a judgment.