2 May 2017
HOFFMAN v R [2017] NZCA 151
- Citation
- [2017] NZCA 151
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The reparation order was valid despite the judge not naming the payee because reparation is administered as a fine by the Registrar/Department of Corrections and the person entitled (the owner, Mr Lye) was evident from the trial; and there was no evidence before the Court to support a challenge to the quantified amount of reparation, so the Court would not disturb the figure; appeal dismissed.