5 Nov 2008
LANE V QUESTNET LIMITED HC AK CIV-2007-404-6164
- Citation
- openlaw-cddfa260_7265_4324_92ca_f082b7500073.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The petition was dismissed because the debt pleaded in the petition had been paid so the petition's allegations were no longer true at hearing as required by s 26(1); the original petitioner cannot substitute a different debt under s 26(9); and any amendment to plead the second judgment would introduce a claim that is statute-barred by the three-month limitation in s 23(b).