21 May 2013
CORO MAINSTREET (INCORPORATED) V THE THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL HC HAM CIV-2012-419-001113
- Citation
- openlaw-07ee044a_79ca_4188_b1b9_174fe374096b.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The High Court dismissed the review: the officer had lawful delegation and validly made the non-notification decision; the council had adequate, independent and peer-reviewed traffic and heritage information to decide non-notification; rule 855.1.1 operates as an assessment criterion within the plan rather than an absolute mandatory setback standard; the activity status was correctly discretionary; no reviewable error, failure to take relevant considerations, nor manifest unreasonableness was shown, so the non-notification decision stands.