31 Oct 2008
DS VANCE V GN BRADBURY HC WN CIV 2008-485-1237
- Citation
- openlaw-9bde39c0_9ed1_407c_95e1_91f9a47bed89.pdf
- Court
- High Court
On the evidence the payments were company property disposed of by Touchtec to the defendant within the specified period, the defendant is a relative of the controller who had control, there is no evidence of consideration provided to the company or a tenable factual defence that the payments were not by the company, and therefore summary judgment under r136 is appropriate to recover $40,000 under s298.