3 Oct 2019
ZT v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2019] NZHC 2513
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 2513
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was granted on the specific legal question whether the Tribunal erred in law by failing to assess the R 5.95.5 surrounding circumstances in light of the underlying purpose (R 4.1), because it was seriously arguable that INZ and the Tribunal did not apply the purposive lens required; leave to judicially review was refused because the Wednesbury unreasonableness threshold was not met and the Tribunal's decision had evidential foundation.