26 Nov 2018
BILLINGTON v MORTON ANOR [2018] NZHC 3084
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 3084
- Court
- High Court
The application for recall was dismissed because the alleged omission (non-use or non-filing of a supplementary submission) did not disclose any relevant matter of such consequence that it would have altered the costs conclusion; the matters raised were principally substantive issues from prior Trustee Act and Family Court proceedings not material to the costs appeal, and therefore did not meet the high threshold required for recall.