28 Nov 2022
XING v STARLIGHT CAPITAL LTD [2022] NZHC 3129
- Citation
- [2022] NZHC 3129
- Court
- High Court
The conditional adjournment required the applicant to file and serve an undertaking to pay damages to obtain interim equivalent relief; the applicant did not satisfy the condition so the adjournment did not take effect and the caveat lapsed, but that failure was not a failure to comply with a direction or order and did not justify increased costs; ordinary 2B costs and disbursements were awarded to the first respondent.