13 Jun 2012
GLASS V PUBLIC TRUST HC AK CIV-2011-404-1976
- Citation
- openlaw-49c437fe_4098_4d8b_a2ad_a1d767b625fc.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Claims dismissed because the small estate and the clear, dominant moral duty to the granddaughter (and her children) together with substantial lifetime financial benefits to Terry (gifted section and undervalue purchase) and limited contact/provision from Kevin meant there was no breach of the willmaker's moral duty; Terry's 2006 conduct reinforced justification for exclusion and further provision would impose an unreasonable burden on the intended primary beneficiary.