8 Oct 2018
ENNOR v AUCKLAND COUNCIL [2018] NZHC 2598
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 2598
- Court
- High Court
Although the council's documentation was not exemplary, the council had adequate information, assessed the salient objectives and policies of the Legacy Plan and the PAUP, properly considered bulk, dominance, shading and privacy effects on the neighbour, and any numerical differences in coverage were immaterial or offset by the pool being a permitted activity; no legal error or procedural unfairness of sufficient gravity was shown to invalidate the non-notified grant, so the judicial review application is dismissed.