15 Sept 2015
MCEWAN v CURTIS [2015] NZHC 2258
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 2258
- Court
- High Court
There was a serious question to be tried that the respondent would breach clause 17 of the cross-lease by selling the property 'as is' and diverting insurance proceeds; the balance of convenience favored preserving the status quo to prevent dissipation of funds and protect applicants' rights, and applicants provided an undertaking as to damages, therefore an interim injunction restraining sale was justified.