New Zealand Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

New Zealand Case Law

Use of a document
  • 9 Aug 2022

    R v N [2022] NZHC 2120

    Citation
    [2022] NZHC 2120
    Court
    High Court

    Although there was no direct evidence of the defendant personally handling or causing the signing of the cheques, the totality of the evidence (roles and duties, pattern of cheque signing and coding, specific miscoding, temporal correlation with change in signing practice and reconstructed accounts) provided a sufficient evidential basis from which a properly directed jury could reasonably conclude the defendant directly or indirectly used the cheques dishonestly; therefore the s147 discharge application was dismissed.