25 Jun 2003
Graham v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2003] NZACC 137
- Court
- District Court
The District Court held the respondent reasonably concluded vocational rehabilitation had been completed for the purposes of s.89(3), properly initiated the WRAP process, and relied on vocational and medical assessors whose reasoned reports justified the finding that the appellant had capacity to work 30–35 hours per week in suitable clerical assistant or warehouse receiver roles; the appeal was dismissed.