21 Nov 2005
HEAD V PROVINCIAL FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOR HC CHCH CIV-2005-409-2166
- Citation
- openlaw-774e87b3_f5d8_4843_915e_698209deb694.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The plaintiff lacked standing because the vehicle and the relevant cause of action vested in the Official Assignee under s42; the Official Assignee declined to pursue or assign the claim (and had disclaimed the vehicle under s75), so the plaintiff's proceedings were an abuse of process and properly struck out under Rule 97 and Rule 186.