25 May 2005
GULF CORPORATION LTD AND ANOR V GULF HARBOUR INVESTMENTS LTD CA CA145/04
- Citation
- openlaw-eaba107f_2a4a_442f_a268_5a0c1e92e587.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Majority held the notices of 21 August 2003 and 29 January 2004 did not effect valid exercise of the registered option because, when the notices are read as a whole, they proposed or contemplated terms and procedures inconsistent with clause 5 of the Easement Transfer and therefore failed the requirement of exact compliance and produced no consensus ad idem; High Court order for specific performance quashed.