16 Feb 2011
TANA V THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL CA CA587/2010
- Citation
- openlaw-095e7ec1_a8aa_4903_9804_c36ef44bfa0e.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Extension of time was granted because delay caused no prejudice, but the appeal was dismissed on the merits because the Judge did not err: the appellant entered the settlement freely and advisedly, the Ministry substantially performed its obligations, and the appellant bore responsibility for on‑going access difficulties making the appeal meritless.