17 Jul 2023
Because the decision refusing access to the transcript was interlocutory and the applicant failed to show any arguable error of law or fact or any sufficient basis for appeal, leave to appeal was properly refused under s56(3) Senior Courts Act and r20.22 High Court Rules.
1 Nov 2019
The applications for leave to appeal the dismissal of the set-aside of summary judgment, for suspension of adjudication, and for a transcript were dismissed: a bankrupt lacks standing to appeal or set aside a judgment relating to a provable debt, there was no evidence of exceptional hardship or merit to justify suspension (creditors would be prejudiced and Official Assignee must be allowed to administer the estate), and no adequate basis was shown to order a transcript (no evidence of mistranslation and undue burden on court resources).
14 Feb 2018
The application for a transcript is dismissed because no written transcript exists, the High Court Rules pre-conditions for ordering a transcript were not satisfied, the hearing was conducted on affidavit evidence so there was nothing substantive to transcribe, and no grounds were shown to direct the National Transcription Service to produce a transcript or to permit copying of an FTR recording without judicial permission.
21 Oct 2011
The recall application is dismissed because the applicant had no right to a transcript under r 6(2), the complaints merely re-litigated the leave judgment, and the alleged fraud was neither explicitly pleaded nor supported by the material before the Court, so there was no basis to reopen the leave decision.