30 May 2007
HOOLE AND PITFIELD IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS OF HILLCREST SERVICES LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) AND ANOR V DARBY AND ORS HC AK CIV 2006-404-5235
- Citation
- openlaw-f3c83381_7ec6_41c9_b7bc_44c5a51ba907.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to cross-examine was refused because the circumstances did not meet the 'special circumstances' threshold in r 253(2) and cross-examination would not produce useful evidence; access to forensic computer material was resolved by consent orders requiring the forensic copy to be retained by the consultant, restricted access, and a staged disclosure procedure giving the first defendant notice and opportunity to object with court resolution if necessary.