30 Jul 2014
NICHOLAS PAUL ALFRED REEKIE v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2014] NZSC 98
- Citation
- [2014] NZSC 98
- Court
- Supreme Court
The application for recall was dismissed because none of the arguments advanced provided fresh or compelling grounds to disturb the earlier judgment: the Court had considered the alleged torture and related High Court findings, there was no substantive inconsistency with Siemer v Heron, the finding that the wrongful detention claim was arguable but caused no detriment was justified on the facts, and the broader procedural and Registrar-related challenges added nothing new.