17 Jan 2000
Frost v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [2000] NZACC 2
- Court
- District Court
The judge found on the evidence that the appellant, due to his injury, did not provide personal exertions (manual or managerial) that generated the business income in the 1996–1997 year; the amended tax return assigning income to his wife reflected that reality and therefore the appellant did not receive earnings from employment exceeding his weekly earnings under s47(1A); appeal allowed.