9 Feb 2004
Accident Compensation Corporation v Gill
- Citation
- [2004] NZACC 10
- Court
- District Court
The court held the respondent was entitled to reimbursement of transport costs under Regulation 8 because she established that Dr Ewer at Mapua provides the particular rehabilitation she requires and the appellant failed to provide evidence that a nearer practitioner in Richmond could provide equivalent treatment; Regulation 17 was not applicable and the Reviewer's decision was upheld for different reasons.