13 Feb 2013
LORNA MARY GEDDES V WAYNE ARTHUR JOHNSON HC TAU CIV-2010-470-747
- Citation
- openlaw-4f427536_5994_473e_a804_166be0f50330.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application was dismissed because the court was not satisfied a substantial miscarriage of justice was likely if the judgment were enforced: the evidence relied on was not fresh and could have been called at trial; the applicant made a deliberate strategic choice not to give or call evidence; prospects of success on any future appeal are remote; and enforcement had already been partly implemented, so no real and substantial risk of injustice existed.